Sunday, July 29, 2012

A Winning Business Plan Pulls Together


In a follow-up to our previous blog on film financing, we will look at elements of our previous perceptions regarding what makes a good business plan in such an industry. Moreover, the ideas of our chosen industry leaders Louise Levison and Thomas Trenker are examined specifically regarding issues. In further researching these 2 leaders, four key areas are immediately pushed to the forefront. In the case of Levison, writing a business plan that is thorough and contains elements of trouble anticipation comes to mind. On the other hand, Trenker’s use of networking events held around the country in the form of town hall meetings for perspective filmmakers and investors is a novel approach that is eye opening. Moreover, the need for budgeting for just such networking events in the initial start up section of a business plan is essential.

Let's look in depth at both of these processes. As mentioned in our last blog, Filmmakers and Financing Plans for Independents by Levison offers a template to any aspiring or established filmmakers on how to create and in present a dynamic project business plan. As Levinson's conjectures, the thing that sinks the vast majority of film companies is their lack of thoroughness in the creation of the business plan. People want to know where their money will be spent, and how it will be returned on their investment. Furthermore, once these numbers are established, what can be done to even further to increase the profitability and decrease area of the loss for the production company? It is these analysis skills that Levison tries to engender to the reader (Levison, 2009).

In turn, Trenker brings the keys of networking to creating an environment conducive to making financing a reality. In the vast majority of cases, the e-mail box is a wasteland generally populated with large amounts of spam and useless attempts to market. However, when an e-mail bearing the possibilities of the finance forums town hall meetings sponsored by Trenker’s Film Angels appear bearing the weight of seriousness, the opportunity brings the environment of opportunity. The power of opportunity is reflected in a manner that not just in making money, but in the profitability long-term. When placed in connection with the lessons learned from Levison’s approach, this opportunity translates into a great confluence.

So, if providing a complete oversight of the lessons learned, the following points are essential.
Levison
  • Make your business plan thorough
  • Show your investors that you're qualified
  • Make sure your investors are repaid in a professional manner
  • Plan to make your company stronger in the long term regardless if it is a single project or not.


Trenker
  • Networking is opportunity
  • Use your opportunities wisely
  • Profitability is the result of a combination of factors


When all that these objectives are taken into consideration, the filmmaker can greatly reduce not just the risk, but chance of conflict in the long-term financial picture; the return to investors is well thought out and the filmmakers reputation is greatly enhanced. I certainly incorporated these areas into my revised business plan. 

Sunday, July 1, 2012

The perfect double play: Levison to Trenker equal your chance!

Thomas Trenker and Louise Levison both carry tremendous weight in the fields of film financing and motion picture business planning for independent filmmakers. Each has been instrumental in creating some of the most groundbreaking areas regarding independent filmmaking. These distinctively influential individuals have parlayed their positions into solid long-term spheres of influence.

In Levison, who specialized in creating business plans specially designed for filmmakers in this sector; the pattern of success is punctuated by the plan for the greatest success story in independent film making history: The Blair Witch Project. The 1999 release was pitched on a business plan created by Levison. While the actual cost of shooting the film is disputed (est. $20,000-$750,000), the world wide box office for the film according to BoxOfficeMojo.com was $140,539,099. This is an amazing figure. Moreover, she has gone to develop business plans for other indie films, lectures at prestigious film festivals, and has written the book considered to be the standard for independent filmmakers: “Filmmakers and Financing: Business Plans for Independents.” Her credentials are very impressive (Levison, 2009).

On the other hand, Trenker serves at the head of the influential FilmAngel motion picture Angel investment group and as director of the Institute for Film Finance. The Swiss educated entrepreneur has taken his background in finance and has leveraged his position in order to create an influentially sizable organization of investors. This positioning of private funding has created a place which was described in the Wall Street Journal in 2009 said Saad Khan, a FilmAngels member and partner at CMEA Capital:

A lot of investors I see FilmAngels resonate for are already successful investors and very heavily weighted in other asset classes such as technology or software. This is a way to diversify their whole asset class in new areas.

So, in these two cases, the need (investors) and the product (the plan) are combined by these crafts. Levison approaches the elements needed to create business plan of attention. She especially gets to the root of their interest; they want to know when and how they are going to profit (and why)?

Financial projections show investors how and when they’ll make their money.
Vital elements investors look for are:

• Worldwide revenues and costs for comparative movies
• Projected profit
• Projected cash flow
• A detailed explanation of the assumptions underlying the financial projections for your film (Levison, 2009)

Accordingly, these are areas which must be clearly laid out before the investors. It can be the difference between funding and being stuck without the necessary capital. On the other hand, the prevailing nature of investing is to gain a return. As noted above, this underlines the importance of the four elements outlined by Levison.